pdp
true
2016.12.5.0.5.0

fsh 4944BUYNOW get coupon44BUYNOW

jcpenney.com | Dockers® Signature Straight-Fit Pants

Dockers® Signature Straight-Fit Pants

web ID: 5145220
both
waist
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 38
  • 40
  • 42
  • 44
inseam
  • 29
  • 30
  • 32
  • 34
  • 36
COLOR
PRODUCT DESCRIPTION

Not too slim, and not too loose, Dockers® Signature straight-fit pants are a great way to update a traditional look for work or play.

 
  • flat front
  • Individual Fit® Waistband adds an invisible extra inch 
  • ColorBond® Technology reduces fading 
  • Spot Lifter™ specially finished to release stains and maintain a clean look 
  • treated to eliminate the need for ironing 
  • sits slightly below waist and is straight through hips & thighs with straight legs
  • soft, microsanded cotton
  • double-welt, button-through back pockets.
  • washable
  • imported
customer favorite
Rated 3 out of 5 by from Too Many Silly Sizing Issues Well, I've always loved the look and feel of Dockers, but now it is rather difficult to get the sizing right with this brand. First, there is a considerable sizing difference between Classic Fit and Straight Fit pants. The Classic Fit seems to have an inseam that is one inch shorter than the stated inseam and the inseam of the Straight Fit pants. So, if you order a pair of 33X30 Classic Fit pants you get pants that are about one inch shorter in length than a pair of 33X30 Straight Fit pants. Next, Dockers produces their pants at various plants around the world (Haiti, Bangladesh, and Nicaragua). The pants produced in Bangladesh are generally roomier than those produced in Nicaragua. So, if you order a pair of 33X30s and they are from Nicaragua...you'll get pants that are tighter around your private regions and the pocket areas. The 33X30s produced in Bangladesh are great and have noticeably more room in the crotch/pocket area.
Date published: 2015-02-28
Rated 1 out of 5 by from Slipping Quality For many years Dockers has been my slacks of choice. The fit was perfect and the quality of material was excellent. Not to mention the durability. For years I considered buying no other pair of pants. Recently it has become far more difficult to find a pair of Dockers that live up to their previous standards. The material is inferior, the stitching causes uneven fits and the sizes are now running smaller than before. For the first time in a long time, I am searching for alternate brands to replace the way the old Dockers use to be.
Date published: 2016-10-28
Rated 1 out of 5 by from Slipping Quality For many years Dockers has been my slacks of choice. The fit was perfect and the quality of material was excellent. Not to mention the durability. For years I considered buying no other pair of pants. Recently it has become far more difficult to find a pair of Dockers that live up to their previous standards. The material is inferior, the stitching causes uneven fits and the sizes are now running smaller than before. For the first time in a long time, I am searching for alternate brands to replace the way the old Dockers use to be.
Date published: 2016-10-28
Rated 2 out of 5 by from Poor stich ing quality Threads used for stich ing comes out after 1st wash
Date published: 2016-09-06
Rated 2 out of 5 by from Different sizing The 35" waist is not the same as the 35" waist size from the exact same model I ordered 2 years ago -- now its smaller (yes I did a side-by-side comparison, no my waist has not expanded). A feature I really liked in the pants from 2 years ago: the black pants had an orange liner inside the waist, the blue pants had a lite blue liner, very easy to tell the difference between black and blue pants in a poorly lit closet. The new pants have the SAME COLOR liner for both black and blue pants, why??? These types of inconsistencies in clothing drives me nuts, you find something you really like and it looks and fits perfectly, then you reorder the same model and you get a different product. Bottom line, Dockers from 2 years ago 5 Stars, this new order, 2 stars.
Date published: 2016-03-08
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Pleasantly Surprised I was pleasantly surprised with this purchase. I have not bought Dockers in 10+ years and was hesitant to do so as I didn't want a "heavy" pant or one that looked semi-casual. I was surprised that the pants were very nice looking for a business dress environment. The fabric is a little heavier than standard dress slacks, but is great for cooler weather. The fit is fantastic. I was unfamiliar with the D1, D2, D3 etc. fit styles and debated between the D1 and D2 as I like a slim fit. I ended up going with the D2 and was glad I did. It is slim fit and if the D1 is more so, then I would be uncomfortable. Initially I was hesitant to buy these pants but they were the only brand that had a color I was after. Now I am finding that I am pulling them out of the closet more often than I thought I would. I would definitely buy again.
Date published: 2013-12-17
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Great Pair of Pants I purchased two pair, one in black and another in branch. These were a birthday gift for my son. He loves the way that the fabric moves with him and that they look great right out of the dryer. The black pair has been washed many times and continues no to fade. I plan to purchase additional pants for my husband and son from J.C. Penney.
Date published: 2010-12-29
Rated 4 out of 5 by from My husband loves these pants I've bought these pants in black for years, and my husband likes the feel of the material. They wash and dry wonderfully. The only thing that I can see wrong with them is, after time, and washings, on the black pair, the belt loops in the back of the pants began to fray, and the white material inside the loops show through. Since I buy 2 or 3 pairs of pants for him, its not a big problem. Sometimes, I use a black permanent marker to color in the white part of the material. I wished the manufacturer could see this review and find a way to make the fabric on the loops more durable. Other than that, they are nice pants at a great price.
Date published: 2012-01-07
  • y_2016, m_12, d_2, h_13
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_0.0
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasreviews, tv_0, tr_493
  • loc_en_US, sid_133209, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=RELEVANCE, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_jcpenney
  • bvseo_sdk, java_sdk, bvseo-2.2.0.4
  • getReviews, method:CLOUD, 28ms
  • REVIEWS, PRODUCT
1 Question2 Answers

Product Q&A

Ask your questions. Share your answers.

 
 
« Back
 
 
Classic Fit was a bit baggy on me, but I am athletic fit with average size quads/hams but I am small below the knee with smaller calfs. Is this the closest fit for me?
8 months ago
by
Jacksonville, FL
Read all my Q&A
Age: 30-39
Gender: Male
How often do you shop at JCPenney? Occasionally
0points
0out of 0found this question helpful.
Was this helpful?helpful0unhelpful0

Answers

Answer: 
I am tall and slender and found the D3 pants to be a bit baggy. These straight fit are perfect--not too tight like the D1, but a good fit.
7 months ago
by
Northwest Florida
Read all my Q&A
Age: 25-29
Gender: Male
How often do you shop at JCPenney? Frequently
+1point
1out of 1found this answer helpful.
Was this helpful?helpful1unhelpful0

Answer: 
Yes, they look much better than the classic, which is baggy on my husband.
8 months ago
by
judge
+1point
1out of 1found this answer helpful.
Was this helpful?helpful1unhelpful0
  • 2016-11-18 T05:19:10.189-06:00
  • bvseo_lps, prod_bvqa, vn_prr_5.6
  • cp-1, bvpage1
  • co_hasquestionsanswers
  • loc_en_US, sid_133209, prod, sort_default
1 of 1
  • 2016-11-18 T05:19:10.190-06:00
  • bvseo_lps, prod_bvqa, vn_prr_5.6
  • cp-1, bvpage1
  • co_hasquestionsanswers
  • loc_en_US, sid_133209, prod, sort_default
1 of 1
  • bvseo_sdk, java_sdk, bvseo-2.2.0.4
  • getContent, method:CLOUD, 24ms
  • QUESTIONS, PRODUCT
attention
selectedSkuId
true
4.41 493