pdp
true
2017.5.1.0.7.0

fsh 9933goshop

jcpenney.com | Haggar® Work to Weekend® Pleated Pants–Big & Tall

Haggar® Work to Weekend® Pleated Pants–Big & Tall

web ID: 5834460
both
waist
  • 44
  • 46
  • 48
  • 50
  • 52
  • 54
  • 56
  • 58
  • 60
inseam
  • 29
  • 30
  • 32
  • 34
COLOR
PRODUCT DESCRIPTION

Whether with a sport coat or polo shirt, these pleated pants fit the occasion with a handsome profile and a comfortable, big and tall fit.

  • hidden expandable waistband
  • pleated front
  • front slash pockets
  • back button-thru welt pockets
  • zip fly with button closure
  • straight leg
  • hemmed
  • cotton
  • washable
  • imported
Rated 1 out of 5 by from Warning: Inseam Is 2 Inches Longer Than Listed Warning: The maker of these pants makes the crotch area so long that you get an additional 2 inches in length to the inseam. Now I have to either return the pants or go to the trouble and expense of finding a place that will raise the inseam. I will never purchase this brand again. *This issue was found on pants by both Haggar and Van Heusen.
Date published: 2017-02-01
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Home Run! My husband is so hard to buy for and very picky how things fit. These where a home run. He liked them so much that I went online and bought them in two other colors. Fabric was high quality and they also wash well with no ironing required. I would highly recommend this product.
Date published: 2017-02-13
Rated 1 out of 5 by from Design Issues The pleated Work-to-Weekend denim pants have been my favorites for years and I normally buy 2-3 pair at a time. Having said that it pains me to say that I can no longer recommend the product. I have to agree with the previous reviewer that at some point recently the pants have been redesigned rather poorly. They do not seem to fit as well as they did in the past. I have specifically noticed that the pockets have been made much smaller and I can barely put my hands in them. It stands to reason that with a Big and Tall size the user would have fairly large hands. My smartphone also falls out when I sit down. I can't believe that decreasing the amount of pocket material could have saved the manufacturer any significant money. I've also noticed that the color is fading unevenly. In any case, if the pants are ever returned to their previous design I hope to be contacted so that I can once again stock up my closet. In the meantime I won't be recommending or purchasing this product.
Date published: 2014-12-02
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Good looks, reasonable price, good fit, and nice quality I wish they came in 28" inseam. I order 29" and have to get them hemmed. Aside from that complaint, these pants are comfortable, look nice, and seem to be very good quality (strong metal zipper, strong "expando" waist thingy).
Date published: 2017-03-15
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Love the denium slacks This is the third pair of Haggar Denium slacks I have bought. They fit nice, and are extremely comfortable. You have a proven product here--don't take them off of the available list.
Date published: 2017-02-20
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Product very will made I am very pleased with my pants I ordered. They fit great and is the first time I bought pants that the pants didn't have to be shorten.
Date published: 2017-02-14
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Hagar Weekend Denim Exactly what I wanted. I now own several pairs, and would recommend them to any handsome older gentleman.
Date published: 2017-04-10
Rated 4 out of 5 by from old standby I've been wearing these for many years now, and usually end up buying a few every 3 - 6 months. I consider them my 'old standby'. I might try other styles/brands but end up back with these. I have noticed a couple of changes over the years. The pockets are about an inch or two shallower (I sometimes carry a checkbook in my pocket and it used to fit without problem, but now it doesn't fit the length). The material has changed and now attracts lint like a super magnet (my cat's fur COVERS the pants, and need the lint roller constantly). I have repeatedly over the years requested more belt loops, as there is just a minimum, but they've never added any more.
Date published: 2015-04-19
  • y_2017, m_4, d_23, h_22
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_1.0.0-hotfix-1
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasreviews, tv_0, tr_91
  • loc_en_US, sid_pp5004860820, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=RELEVANCE, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_jcpenney
  • bvseo_sdk, java_sdk, bvseo-2.2.0.4
  • getReviews, method:CLOUD, 41ms
  • REVIEWS, PRODUCT
  • bvseo_sdk, java_sdk, bvseo-2.2.0.4
  • getContent, method:CLOUD, 92ms
  • QUESTIONS, PRODUCT
  • bvseo-msg: The resource to the URL or file is currently unavailable.;
attention
selectedSkuId
true
4.0 91