fsh 99GOSHOP65 get couponGOSHOP65

jcpenney.com | Worthington® 3/4-Sleeve Tunic or Slim-Fit Ankle Pants

Worthington® 3/4-Sleeve Tunic or Slim-Fit Ankle Pants

web ID: 8169039

$15 15.00 sale 64% off $42 42.00 original $15 $15

Pair our tunic and slim-fit ankle pants for a comfortable and professional look.

Items also available:

child pp image

see details + images

Worthington® Modern Fit Suiting Ankle Pants

$15 15.00 sale 64% off $42 42.00 original



Returns Policy
size range
  • Misses
  • Misses Short
  • Misses Long
  • 4
  • 6
  • 8
  • 10
  • 12
  • 14
  • 16
  • 18
Rated 5 out of 5 by from These are THAT one pair of pants... you know the ones that are comfortable to wear,.. you feel good in....you look good in. i like the material ( black- verdict pending on color fastness of material! too soon to tell) ....pockets are good....the hidden zipper inside bottom leg is a nice touch if you need it.....
Date published: 2017-04-25
Rated 3 out of 5 by from Saggy front If you have a healthy rear end, then the pants will fit your backside and thighs but the front will sag. I didn't realize until I had take tags off so it was too late to return. So I had to remedy this by wearing a long shirt. I do, however, love the pattern, length and tapered leg.
Date published: 2017-04-14
Rated 4 out of 5 by from These ankle pants are great for dressy occasion, every day, etc. These ankle pants are comfy, run true to size and would look great with many colors of tops. Look great with low heel, slip on shoe (black or white). I like the color it is called black & white 'chain', looks like a very small chain of those two colors through out the pants.
Date published: 2017-05-05
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Perfect and stylish for Spring When I tried these on I knew this was the perfect "go with everything" ankle length pant for spring. I am on the taller side and still found these to fit just right. I highly recommend them.
Date published: 2017-04-19
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Truly a Great Buy! These pants were an awesome fit. I paired it with a blazer and it looked wonderful together. I wore it to a wedding and was so comfortable. A great purchase.
Date published: 2017-04-18
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Loved the fit and the look The pants felt great on - perfect fit. The price was below what I would have expected to pay. Will definitely be looking for same style in different colors!
Date published: 2017-05-09
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Fit So Well! These pants are the first pair of dress pants I have found to fit my hips, thighs and waist. They are true to size and feel great on!
Date published: 2017-05-02
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Perfect fit These are the only dress slacks I will purchase, this are perfect for me as I am a petite person. Love the length and fit
Date published: 2017-05-02
  • y_2017, m_6, d_21, h_15
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_1.0.0-hotfix-1
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasreviews, tv_0, tr_134
  • loc_en_US, sid_ens6007830005, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=RELEVANCE, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_jcpenney
  • bvseo_sdk, java_sdk, bvseo-
  • getReviews, method:CLOUD, 44ms

Is this the one with zipper at the bottom?

Asked by: AnuC
Answered by: Loveit
Date published: 2017-05-23

What does the front of it look like?

Asked by: Tammy
Basic button down.
Answered by: Becca9
Date published: 2016-10-22

What is the material makeup of these pants?

Asked by: Jamie
soft cotton blend
Answered by: Niecy
Date published: 2017-05-24

Define 'short' vs 'long', pls...

Asked by: JapaneseAssassin
They are about 3" above the ankle bone
Answered by: Deshopper
Date published: 2017-06-03

What is the inseam on the LONG sizes?

Asked by: Maddmudder
just a little, but would have it a little longer than too short.
Answered by: naeim71
Date published: 2017-05-29
  • y_2017, m_6, d_21, h_15CST
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvqa, vn_bulk_1.0.0-hotfix-1
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasquestionsanswers, tq_6
  • loc_en_US, sid_ens6007830005, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=NUM_ANSWERS, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_jcpenney
  • bvseo_sdk, java_sdk, bvseo-
  • getContent, method:CLOUD, 34ms
4.54 134