Rated 3 out of 5 by JCM71 Nice leggings, but...
I've had good luck with the Nicole Miller brand in the past so I figured these would be just as good as the other items I bought.
The good: They look nice and are more fun than plain leggings. The stripe and the button detail really dress them up. They look great with casual flats, dressy heels or booties. The lighter weight fabric feels less "bulky" than some leggings.
The bad: The lighter weight fabric seems to make them a bit fragile. Both my pairs have the seam issue that other reviewers have mentioned. Also, being lightweight, something tunic length is probably the way to go with these.
October 18, 2015
Rated 1 out of 5 by LMcD82 Weak Seams Makes for One-Wear Only
I was SO excited about these adorable leggings; they were thick enough to not see through, the ankle button embellishment detail was so cute, and the price point was so reasonable. I bought 3 pairs at a JCP store and one pair online a few days later. But then I wore them. The crotch seam pulled and stretched so badly within a few hours that i had a full front to back rip by the end of the work day. I thought for sure this was just a faulty pair, but nope, same thing happened to me with 2 of the other 3 pairs. I am SO disappointed because I LIVE In leggings and I thought I'd hit the jackpot with these. I guess you truly do get what you pay for, and sadly I will not be purchasing these again. I can't return them because I've already worn them and now they're ruined, so there goes my $$ right down the drain. Bummer!
December 7, 2012
Rated 4 out of 5 by hope4abhi Add a beautiful touch to your wardrobe...:)
I liked this legging very much. Its button detail makes it surprisingly awesome. I would suggest you guys not to go by sizing chart for this, coz i usually wear size small in most of the bottoms and this size chart suggested me to go for XS and i tried both the sizes in store and chose small to go for. But when i actually wore it out for almost 2 hrs i felt like as if i was packed in these. The material is kind of snug so gonna try size medium now and will see how it works. Overall a nice shiny must have legging.
October 16, 2013
Rated 2 out of 5 by WLA27 Not good quality - only lasted two wears
I really liked these when they arrived, but I was not expecting how "thin" they are. The third time I wore them they "ran" in the middle like pantyhose do. I had only worn them a couple hours two other times and then washed on delicate and hung to dry so I am very disappointed. I am returning them this weekend. The detailing is so cute, if they were just made of better material they would be awesome!
January 24, 2014
Rated 4 out of 5 by hatetowritereiews Studs really add to the look.
I have received many compliments while wearing these leggings. They wash well either by hand or on delicate in the machine. My only problem with them is, that the studs work their way out of the holes around them. The holes are too big. The studs should be attached to the material without putting holes in the leggings. I have actually sewn the holes tighter around the studs.
September 4, 2013
Rated 1 out of 5 by DeeLeee Ripped at the crotch for my daughter as well
Read the reviews noting that the leggins ripped at the crotch for some customers and was astonished that I was not alone. This problem occurred for me as well, which made them unwearable after three wearings/washings. Strange that the problem happened repeatedly with many pairs of leggings and for different customers. Must be a defect of some sort.
January 8, 2013
Rated 5 out of 5 by Adventurer good fit, looks great
I bought this item last year when it was available for international shipping. I have no regrets!
August 23, 2014
Rated 3 out of 5 by Vireroo OK product, more for the young'uns
Reasonably well constructed. More shiny and nylon-y than they look in the picture. Probably great for a young person who is -- or wants to look like -- a dancer.
I had planned to remove the buttons near the ankles (since I only want to wear these with boots anyway) but they are seriously grommeted on.
April 29, 2011